in short, the forms of consciousness

you are interested in experiences rich experiences. is that so? theater players have ways of generating experiences. eugenio barba. wrote a book about change of direction. they are strategies to enrich the experience. insects collect in a zigzag. Nature has ways to repair gaps and builds stocks and Qualia. we are talking about what is behind the framework

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

to know how life was formed. the only plausible resource is to analyze ancient stones from when the earth was formed. but there are thinkers who have written about it without seeing stones. they are poets. that die and are reborn every day in an exemplary way. there's a lot written about those breaks

 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

SORRY. the imagination is very fertile and creates circles of study by suspicion. But I want a little consideration with those people whose job is to identify the system to reproduce it. The description that the experience nests itself to create entities must be related to a meta-memory where that reality is saved. In this theme of metaphysical-imagination. You will always find people who want to simulate the story. It's natural. And at the end of the intellectual life of the universe. Both parts exist. Like Parmenides and Heraclito.

 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

polarity. action and reaction effect, the arrow of time. they are based on the existence of death as a primary fact. But to discern about life is to find a place in that discrepancy, where sufficient tranquility persists, so that the experience can nest.

 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

the mind has several focuses. and they are not many. it's like looking through a kaleidoscope. but there are not many colors. there are open spaces. it is the stage of free will thinking. of the multiple encounter. it has no windows or doors. Leibniz called Monad. there are other focuses: from the top contemplating the other being who is your opposite and who comes from the bottom to exchange his state. there is a law, (mechanism??) Newton called fluxons. but that is our thinking tool. outside there are many voices and entities. bubbling over the fragile lightness of being or traveling in the permutation of being

 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>"The matter that life faces is organized by life. To the extent it already exists that way without life, we can observe, hypothesize and theorize. This is built in to living awareness. Living beings must predict to survive. By survive, I mean continue."

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

"If God exists, it is an ideal endpoint just beyond theory. We keep searching. We might be God doing the searching."

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I must be humble. My appreciation of conscious comes from studying the role of discourse in dominating other conscious beings. It makes me think of the types of conscious presences that will appear on my way. Over the years and the projects that I have lived I have found these two states that I wrote to Craig (monad & fluxons) it is pure defense of my integrity. God is life and love in an ambivalent context where the present is active factor at that moment. luck may or may not favor me. God is pendulum or cloak. like consciences. but although I see the signs of enchantment of the consciences. I must respect their spaces and locations for their role in life and in the making of the present. which is the gift of living. If I make the mistake of playing Manipulate that conscious body, I can be expelled and see the madness. division of the conscious in different planes